| Structure Identification: |
| Journal of fruit science, 2015. | | Analysis of aromatic compounds in three melon cultivars(Cucumis melo L.) by solid phase microextracion with GC-MS.[Reference: WebLink] | To elucidate the characteristic aroma compounds of different melon cultivars.
METHODS AND RESULTS:
The ripened fruits were identified by combining headspace solid-phase microextraction(HS-SPME)with GC-MS method.The results showed that 92,58,54 kinds of compounds werefound from‘C51',‘C52'and‘Baiyumantang'respectively. Esters were their primary components.Among them 10 kinds of common compounds were detected,such as acetic acid butyl ester,1-butanol2-methyl-acetate,Acetic acid hexyl ester,3-hexen-1-ol acetate,acetic acid octyl ester,2,3-butane-dioldiacetate,acetic acid phenyl methyl ester,phenyl ethyl alcohol,6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one,tridecane. The relative content of acetic acid phenyl methyl ester was the highest. The cultivars‘C51'and‘C52'both had propanoic acid 2-methylpropyl ester,butanoic acid 2-methylpropyl ester,acetic acid heptyl ester,3-octen-1-ol acetate,2-pentanol propanoate,2,4-nonadien-1-ol,2,6-nonadienal,3,5-octadiene. Acetic acid 2-chloro-phenylethyl ester,propanoic acid 2-methyl-3-phenylpro-pyl ester were identified only in‘C51',their relative content accounted for 16.58%,2.09% respectively.The content of 2,4-Nonadien-1-ol,3-Nonen-1-ol,2,6-Nonadienal reached up to 2.57%,3.14%and4.29% respectively in‘C52',which could be its characteristic aroma constituents. The sulfur compoundsin‘Baiyumangtang'were far more than in‘C51'and‘C52'. Ethyl(methylthio)acetate,methyl 2-(me-thylthio)acetate,3-(methylthio)propanoic acid ethyl ester,methyl thiirane,allyl methyl sulfide werethe unique constituents of‘Baiyumantang',which accounted for 9.02% of the total aroma content,andmethyl thiirane and allyl methyl sulfide have not been reported in other melons,so they could be the char-acteristic constituents of"baiyumantang".
CONCLUSIONS:
The climacteric melon was rich in aroma. Thecharacteristic aroma compounds were different among different types of melon. |
|
Cell. 2018 Jan 11;172(1-2):249-261.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.019.IF=36.216(2019)
Cell Metab. 2020 Mar 3;31(3):534-548.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.002.IF=22.415(2019)
Mol Cell. 2017 Nov 16;68(4):673-685.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.022.IF=14.548(2019)
ACS Nano. 2018 Apr 24;12(4): 3385-3396. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08969.IF=13.903(2019)
Nature Plants. 2016 Dec 22;3: 16206. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.205.IF=13.297(2019)
Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 24;4(10): eaat6994. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat6994.IF=12.804(2019)